Mogadishu (PP Editorial) — The Kenyan government asked for the International Court of Justice to postponing the hearing on the maritime dispute between Kenya and Somalia. It cites a constitutional crisis in Mogadishu as a reason for the hearing to take place when political uncertainties in Somalia come to an end.
Kenya’s legal advisors treat the maritime dispute as a case between a sovereign Kenya and the Federal Government of Somalia. Such a flawed legal reasoning points to the hope Nairobi places in a new Somali government that could be less interested in the outcome of the maritime dispute.
A Memorandum of Understanding signed by a Minister of the former Transitional Federal Government forms the core of Kenya’s argument. Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, a former Somalia President and a member of the Alliance of Presidential Candidates, criticised President Mohammed Abdullahi Mohammed for not putting a lot of effort into the maritime dispute. This is not a time for political point-scoring. The Alliance of Presidential Candidates has missed an opportunity to stand by the Federal Government of Somalia in its rejection of Kenya’s request to postpone the hearing.
Kenya’s posturing is a threat to the world order. Its forces are peacekeepers in Somalia under Amisom mandate. Kenya seeks to exploit Somalia’s weaker geopolitical position to a point of making outlandish claims about the sovereignty of Somalia.
The maritime dispute between Somalia and Kenya is a test case on the durability of the post-World War II order. In Africa, where sovereignty is a cornerstone of the Charter of the African Union, the maritime dispute reflects the unethical manoeuvres to which a member state can resort.
Somali political leaders at all levels should commend the Federal Government of Somalia for calling out Kenya’s disingenuous request to the International Court of Justice.
© Puntland Post, 2021
You must be logged in to post a comment.